Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
70
Highlights
99
Differences
6
Reactions
0
Likes
UltiMaker 2
vs
MakerBot Method X:
70 Highlights & 99 Differences —
So, Which 3D Printer Actually Works Better
Decide on your ideal 3D printer based on skill level and application.
What sets UltiMaker 2 apart from MakerBot Method X? This 3d printers face-off compares specs like weight, space requirement, connectivity options & uv light source type and beyond.
UltiMaker 2 vs MakerBot Method X: A Deep Dive Into Two 3D Printing Titans
If you're diving into the world of 3D printing, choosing the right machine is crucial. The UltiMaker 2 and the MakerBot Method X represent two distinct approaches in desktop and professional 3D printing. Both are FDM/FFF printers designed for precision prototyping, but their core strengths set them apart: UltiMaker 2 is tailored more towards beginner and intermediate users with an affordable, compact desktop setup, whereas the MakerBot Method X targets professionals and industrial users who demand robust materials, advanced features, and automation. This comparison covers their build volumes, extrusion types, material compatibility, performance, hardware, and connectivity to help you decide which suits your needs.
UltiMaker 2: Compact Efficiency Meets Simplicity
The UltiMaker 2 boasts a smaller footprint at roughly 3.5 sq ft of space requirement and weighs just 24.69 lbs, making it a nimble choice for tight desktop setups. Its 653.69 cm³ build volume grants a decent size for most prototyping tasks, especially suitable for consumer-level use. This machine relies on a single extruder with a Bowden drive system, supporting PLA and ABS filaments primarily with a larger 2.85 mm diameter. While it lacks a heated chamber, its extruder can reach temperatures up to 536°F to accommodate these materials.
Performance-wise, the UltiMaker 2 hits up to 300 mm/s officially but effectively delivers about 60 mm/s, with layer resolutions between 40-200 microns. Print calibration is manual, and it does not include fault detection or recovery, requiring an attentive operator. The printer features an open Cartesian frame with a glass build plate that is removable and manually leveled. It lacks advanced sensors like filament runout detection or power-loss recovery, but compensates somewhat with quick-swap nozzles and replaceable hotends for easier maintenance.
For connectivity, it remains straightforward, supporting SD card and USB file transfer, with no cloud-based or remote monitoring options. It uses Cura as its slicer, favoring users who are comfortable with offline workflows. While its safety features are basic, it is CE certified and has overheat protection, but no enclosure locks or emergency stops. Overall, it's a reliable and accessible option priced competitively around $1900 at around $1900 on Amazon.com.
MakerBot Method X: Industrial-Grade Innovation and Control
In contrast, the MakerBot Method X commands a larger and heavier footprint (65 lbs) but features a smaller space requirement of 2.83 sq ft owing to its design. Its build volume impresses at 868.97 cm³, providing ample room for more complex parts. This printer excels with dual extruders featuring direct drive technology, capable of multi-material printing. Combined with its fully enclosed heated chamber (up to 230 °F), it effortlessly manages advanced engineering filaments like ABS, ASA, PC, and PVA; a boon for professional-grade functional prototypes and industrial parts.
Regarding print quality, Method X offers finer layer resolutions down to 20 microns, with an automatic first layer calibration system and intelligent features such as spaghetti/fault detection and print recovery to minimize failures. The enclosed frame integrates HEPA and carbon air filtration, a 5-inch touchscreen, a built-in camera, and comprehensive sensors, including filament runout and power-loss recovery, creating a safe and user-friendly printing environment.
The connectivity ecosystem is robust, supporting USB, LAN, Wi-Fi, and cloud-based software enabling remote monitoring, multi-printer fleet management, and API integration. This combination fits professional studios requiring workflow integration and multi-user profiles. Additionally, safety certifications include CE and FCC, plus enclosure lock, emergency stop, and auto shutdown on errors, complying with rigorous industrial standards.
Maintenance is streamlined with tool-free access, self-diagnostics, predictive alerts, and regular firmware updates, enhancing uptime. Business features like print farm management, cloud fleet control, SLA support contracts, usage analytics, and predictive cost estimation position the MakerBot Method X as a premium solution for enterprises and engineering teams willing to invest accordingly at around $5788.42 at MatterHackers.
Quick Take
The UltiMaker 2 shines with its compact design, affordability, and straightforward operation, ideal for beginners or hobbyists who want reliable quality without breaking the bank. Meanwhile, the MakerBot Method X impresses with its advanced material capabilities, automated precision features, enterprise-class safety, and seamless connectivity, catering directly to professionals demanding high uptime and industrial-grade output.
Bottom Line
For those prioritizing professional functionality, materials versatility, and automation necessary in industrial or engineering workflows, the MakerBot Method X emerges as the clear leader despite its higher price tag. Conversely, users seeking a dependable, budget-conscious machine for everyday desktop 3D printing will find the UltiMaker 2 an excellent, no-frills choice that performs consistently well.
Verdict
Winner: MakerBot Method X - Offers superior print precision, multi-material capability, advanced hardware features, and robust enterprise integrations tailored for professional environments.
Runner-up: UltiMaker 2 - Boasts a compact footprint, ease of use, and affordability, ideal for beginners and intermediate users focused on basic prototyping with PLA and ABS.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Not sure which smart tech to go for? We compared UltiMaker 2 vs MakerBot Method X down to every detail — including specs, perks, and what users are really saying.
In the battle of Warranty Period,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Period on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Printer Type
What type of printer is it?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
FDM/FFF
0
MakerBot Method X
1Votes
FDM/FFF
UltiMaker 2
This 3D printer operates using the FDM/FFF (Fused Deposition Modeling/Fused Filament Fabrication) technology. This is a common method that melts and extrudes thermoplastic filament.
Defines the printing technology used by the machine.
In the battle of Printer Type,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Based on community votes for Printer Type,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
MakerBot Method X ◉,
which got 1 votes.
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Intermediate, Advanced, Professional
UltiMaker 2
This printer is suitable for a wide range of users, from Beginner to Intermediate and Advanced levels. Its design aims for accessibility while offering capabilities for experienced users.
Indicates the recommended skill level.
In the battle of Target User Level,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Target User Level on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Assembly Type
What is the assembly type?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Prebuilt
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Prebuilt
MakerBot Method X
The printer is supplied as a Prebuilt unit, eliminating the need for user assembly.
Shows whether the printer is sold as a kit requiring assembly or fully prebuilt.
In the battle of Assembly Type,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Assembly Type on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Upgrade Path
Does it support an upgrade path?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
UltiMaker 2
This printer offers an upgrade path, meaning it can be enhanced with new features or components over time. This helps extend its lifespan and capabilities.
Whether the printer can be expanded with official or third-party upgrades.
In the battle of Upgrade Path,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Upgrade Path on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Product Name
What is the product name?
0
UltiMaker 2
1Votes
UltiMaker 2
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
The commercial name of the 3D printer.
In the battle of Product Name,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Based on community votes for Product Name,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
MakerBot Method X ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Just feel like the UltiMaker 2 has been around longer and proven itself.
See more
Model Number
What is the model number?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
2
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Method X
Manufacturer’s reference code for precise identification.
In the battle of Model Number,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Number on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Supported Applications
What applications are supported?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Prototyping
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Prototyping, Engineering
Lists the most common applications supported.
In the battle of Supported Applications,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Supported Applications on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Weight,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
40.3 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the printer’s width?
14.1
inch
0Votes
17.2
inch
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
The physical width of the printer is 14.1 inch (35.81 cm). This is the total dimension from left to right.
The total external width of the printer.
In the battle of Width,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
3.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Height
What is the printer’s height?
15.3
inch
0Votes
25.6
inch
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
The physical height of the printer is 25.6 inches (65.02 cm).
The total external height of the printer.
In the battle of Height,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
10.3 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Package Weight
What is the package weight?
46.2
lbs
0Votes
77
lbs
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
The shipping package has a weight of 46.2 lbs (20.96 kg). This is the total weight for transport and handling.
total shipping weight including packaging.
In the battle of Package Weight,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
30.8 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Weight on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the printer’s depth?
13.5
inch
0Votes
16.3
inch
0Votes
The total external depth of the printer.
In the battle of Depth,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
2.8 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Folded Width
What is the folded width?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Width of the printer when folded (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Folded Width on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Folded Depth
What is the folded depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Depth of the printer when folded.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Folded Depth on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Folded Height
What is the folded height?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Height of the printer when folded.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Folded Height on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
22.8
inch
0Votes
21.5
inch
0Votes
Width of the printer’s packaging.
In the battle of Package Width,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
higher
1.3 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
22.8
inch
0Votes
29.5
inch
0Votes
Depth of the printer’s packaging.
In the battle of Package Depth,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
6.7 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
27.6
inch
0Votes
32
inch
0Votes
Height of the printer’s packaging.
In the battle of Package Height,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
4.4 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Build-to-Printer Size Ratio
What is the build-to-printer size ratio?
15.4
%
0Votes
2.92
%
0Votes
The efficiency ratio of build volume relative to the overall printer size.
In the battle of Build-to-Printer Size Ratio,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
higher
12.5 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build-to-Printer Size Ratio on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
The recommended storage temperature range for the printer is 32-89.6 °F (0-32 °C). Storing the printer within this range helps preserve its components.
Safe temperature range for storing the printer when not in use.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Both printers have the same operating temp range, but I lean toward MakerBot overall.
See more
Storage Humidity Range
What is the storage humidity range?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
20-70%
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
0-80%
MakerBot Method X
The printer should be stored in an environment with a relative humidity range between 0-80% (non-condensing) to prevent damage.
Safe humidity range for storing the printer.
In the battle of Storage Humidity Range,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Humidity Range on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Humidity Range
What is the operating humidity range?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
20-70%
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
0-80%
Acceptable humidity range during printer operation.
In the battle of Operating Humidity Range,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Humidity Range on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Power Supply Type
What type of power supply does it use?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Internal
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Internal
Indicates whether the printer uses an internal or external power supply.
In the battle of Power Supply Type,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Supply Type on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
221
Watt
0Votes
800
Watt
0Votes
Average power usage during active printing.
In the battle of Power Consumption,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
579.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Power Consumption
What is the idle power consumption?
10
Watt
0Votes
100
Watt
0Votes
Power drawn while the printer is on but not printing.
In the battle of Idle Power Consumption,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
90.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Power Consumption on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
UltiMaker 2 minimum layer resolution is 40 microns compared to 20 microns for MakerBot Method X; MakerBot Method X can print finer details, suitable for precision models.
Finest layer height achievable.
In the battle of Layer Resolution Minimum,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
higher
20.0 microns
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Layer Resolution Minimum on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Whether the printer supports independent extruder heads.
In the battle of Independent Dual Extruder,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Independent Dual Extruder on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
UltiMaker 2 uses Bowden extruder drive type while MakerBot Method X uses direct drive; Bowden reduces moving mass whereas direct drive improves flexible filament handling.
The type of filament feeding system.
In the battle of Extruder Drive Type,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Extruder Drive Type on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Build Width
What is the build width?
9.1
inch
0Votes
7.5
inch
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
The maximum build width of the printer is 9.1 inch (23.11 cm). This indicates the printable dimension along the X-axis.
Maximum printable width of the build area.
In the battle of Build Width,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
higher
1.6 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Width on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Build Depth
What is the build depth?
8.9
inch
0Votes
7.5
inch
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
The maximum build depth of the printer is 8.9 inch (22.61 cm). This determines the printable dimension along the Y-axis.
Maximum printable depth of the build area.
In the battle of Build Depth,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
higher
1.4 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Depth on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Build Volume
What is the build volume?
653.69
cubic in
0Votes
868.97
cubic in
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
The total build volume of the printer is 653.69 cubic inch (10,712 cm³). This is the total space available for printing objects.
total printable volume capacity.
In the battle of Build Volume,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
215.3 cubic in
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Volume on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Optional Nozzle Sizes
What optional nozzle sizes are supported?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
0.25mm, 0.4mm, 0.6mm, 0.8mm
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
0.4mm, 0.6mm
UltiMaker 2
The printer supports optional nozzle sizes of 0.25mm, 0.4mm, 0.6mm, and 0.8mm. This flexibility allows for varying print detail and speed requirements.
Alternative nozzle sizes supported.
In the battle of Optional Nozzle Sizes,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Optional Nozzle Sizes on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Quick-Swap Nozzles
Does it have quick-swap nozzles?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Quick-Swap Nozzles
Both printers support quick-swap nozzles; this simplifies maintenance and nozzle changes.
Nozzles can be quickly swapped without tools.
In the battle of Quick-Swap Nozzles,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick-Swap Nozzles on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Layer Resolution Maximum
What is the maximum layer resolution?
200
microns
0Votes
400
microns
0Votes
vs
Layer Resolution Maximum
UltiMaker 2 maximum layer resolution is 200 microns while MakerBot Method X is 400 microns; UltiMaker 2 supports finer maximum layer thickness enabling smoother finishes.
Thickest layer height achievable.
In the battle of Layer Resolution Maximum,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
200.0 microns
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Layer Resolution Maximum on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Standard Nozzle Diameter
What is the standard nozzle diameter?
0.4
mm
0Votes
0.4
mm
0Votes
Default nozzle diameter provided.
In the battle of Standard Nozzle Diameter,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
equal
0.40 mm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standard Nozzle Diameter on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Filament Diameter Supported
What filament diameter is supported?
2.85
mm
0Votes
1.75
mm
0Votes
vs
Filament Diameter Supported
UltiMaker 2 supports 2.85 mm filament diameter and MakerBot Method X supports 1.75 mm; the choice depends on filament availability preference.
The filament size compatible with printer.
In the battle of Filament Diameter Supported,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
higher
1.1 mm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Filament Diameter Supported on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Max Extruder Temperature
What is the max extruder temperature?
536
°F
0Votes
572
°F
0Votes
vs
Max Extruder Temperature
UltiMaker 2 has a maximum extruder temperature of 536°F while MakerBot Method X can go up to 572°F; MakerBot Method X enables printing with higher temperature materials.
Maximum heating capability of extruder.
In the battle of Max Extruder Temperature,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
36.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max Extruder Temperature on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Min Extruder Temperature
What is the min extruder temperature?
32
°F
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Lowest operable extruder temperature.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Min Extruder Temperature on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Bed Temperature Gradient
What is the bed temperature gradient?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Variance in heat across the bed surface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bed Temperature Gradient on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Heated Chamber
Does the printer have a heated chamber?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Whether the printer has a heated build chamber.
In the battle of Heated Chamber,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heated Chamber on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Chamber Temperature Control Range
What is the chamber temperature control range?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Up to 230 °F
Range of temperatures the printer chamber can maintain
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Chamber Temperature Control Range on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Number of Extruders
How many extruders does the printer have?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
1
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
2
total extruders installed.
In the battle of Number of Extruders,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Number of Extruders on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum amount of resin the tank can hold.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max Resin Tank Capacity on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Filament Drying Required
Is filament drying required?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Filament Drying Required
Both printers require filament drying; this ensures filament quality and print reliability.
Whether drying filament before use is necessary.
In the battle of Filament Drying Required,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Filament Drying Required on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Third-Party Material
Does it support third-party materials?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
UltiMaker 2
This printer supports the use of third-party materials. This offers users greater flexibility in filament choice beyond proprietary options.
Ability to use non-proprietary materials.
In the battle of Third-Party Material,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Third-Party Material on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Resin Auto-Fill
Does it have resin auto-fill?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
MakerBot Method X
No, this printer does not feature a resin auto-fill system, meaning resin needs to be manually added or replenished.
Automatic filling of resin during prints.
In the battle of Resin Auto-Fill,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Resin Auto-Fill on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Biocompatible Materials Support
Does it support biocompatible materials?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Biocompatible Materials Support
Neither supports biocompatible materials; not suitable for medical-grade printing.
Supports resins/filaments approved for medical or dental use.
In the battle of Biocompatible Materials Support,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Biocompatible Materials Support on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Supported Filament Types
What filament types are supported?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
PLA, ABS
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
ABS, ASA, PC, PVA
Filament materials that the printer can process.
In the battle of Supported Filament Types,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Supported Filament Types on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Max Supported Filament Diameter
What is the maximum supported filament diameter?
2.85
mm
0Votes
1.75
mm
0Votes
Maximum filament diameter that can be used.
In the battle of Max Supported Filament Diameter,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
higher
1.1 mm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max Supported Filament Diameter on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Filament Dry Box
Does it support filament dry boxes?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Filament Dry Box
Neither printer includes a filament dry box; filament storage needs external solutions.
Supports use of a dry box to prevent filament moisture issues.
In the battle of Filament Dry Box,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Filament Dry Box on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Material Printing
Can it print with multiple materials?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Multi-Material Printing
UltiMaker 2 does not support multi-material printing while MakerBot Method X does; MakerBot Method X enables multi-material or color prints.
Ability to print with multiple materials simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Material Printing,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Material Printing on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Max Number of Materials Supported
What is the maximum number of materials supported?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
1
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
2
Maximum distinct materials supported in one job.
In the battle of Max Number of Materials Supported,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max Number of Materials Supported on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Supported Resin Types
What resin types are supported?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
None
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
None
vs
Supported Resin Types
Both printers do not support any resin types; neither is designed for resin 3D printing.
Resin types that the printer can use.
In the battle of Supported Resin Types,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Supported Resin Types on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Compatible Resin Wavelength
What resin wavelength is compatible?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Light wavelength compatibility for curing resins.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatible Resin Wavelength on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Print Speed & Performance
15
Print Adhesion Type
What type of print adhesion is used?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Glue
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Other
UltiMaker 2
The recommended print adhesion type for this printer is Glue. Applying glue to the build plate helps ensure the first layer sticks properly and prevents warping.
MakerBot Method X
The printer uses an "Other" print adhesion type, which is typically a specific coated surface for reliable part adhesion.
Method used to secure prints to the bed.
In the battle of Print Adhesion Type,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Print Adhesion Type on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Print Accuracy
What is the print accuracy?
12.5
microns
0Votes
200
microns
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
The print accuracy of the device is rated at 200 microns, indicating its precision in reproducing fine details.
Degree of dimensional accuracy of printed parts.
In the battle of Print Accuracy,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
lower
187.5 microns
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Print Accuracy on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Noise Level
What is the idle noise level?
50
dB
0Votes
40
dB
0Votes
vs
Idle Noise Level
UltiMaker 2 idle noise is 50 dB and MakerBot Method X is quieter at 40 dB; MakerBot Method X is more silent when idle.
Measures the noise when printer is on but not printing; lower is better.
In the battle of Idle Noise Level,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
, delivering
higher
10.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Noise Level on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Print Recovery
Does the printer support print recovery?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
1Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Print Recovery
UltiMaker 2 does not have print recovery while MakerBot Method X includes this feature; MakerBot Method X better handles power interruptions.
Ability to resume print after power loss or interruption.
In the battle of Print Recovery,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Based on community votes for Print Recovery,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
MakerBot Method X ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Honestly, the noise level on the UltiMaker 2 gets to me, it's a bit quieter overall.
See more
Official Max Print Speed
What is the official max print speed?
300
mm/s
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Official Max Print Speed
UltiMaker 2's official max print speed is 300 mm/s while MakerBot Method X's is unavailable; UltiMaker advertises a higher max speed.
Manufacturer-claimed maximum print speed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Official Max Print Speed on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Measured Effective Print Speed
What is the effective measured print speed?
60
mm/s
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Measured Effective Print Speed
Measured effective print speed for UltiMaker 2 is 60 mm/s; MakerBot Method X's data unavailable; real-world speed comparisons uncertain.
Independently measured real-world print speed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Measured Effective Print Speed on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Time to Print Benchy
How long does it take to print a Benchy?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Average time to complete the benchmark “Benchy” model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Time to Print Benchy on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
First Layer Calibration
How is the first layer calibrated?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Manual
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Auto
vs
First Layer Calibration
UltiMaker 2 requires manual first layer calibration whereas MakerBot Method X has automatic calibration; MakerBot Method X offers easier setup.
Method used for first-layer bed calibration.
In the battle of First Layer Calibration,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
First Layer Calibration on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Bridging Performance
What is the bridging performance?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Longest unsupported horizontal span printed without sagging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bridging Performance on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Overhang Performance
What is the overhang performance?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum angle of unsupported overhangs achievable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overhang Performance on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Spaghetti/Fault Detection
Does it have spaghetti or fault detection?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Detects failed prints or filament tangles.
In the battle of Spaghetti/Fault Detection,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spaghetti/Fault Detection on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Continuous Print Time
What is the max continuous print time?
72
hours
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum supported printing time without interruption.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Continuous Print Time on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Print Success Rate
What is the print success rate?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Percentage of prints successfully completed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Print Success Rate on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Print Quality Rating
What is the print quality rating?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
8
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rated score for overall print quality (0–10).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Print Quality Rating on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Vibration Compensation,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Vibration Compensation on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Touchscreen Display
Does it have a touchscreen display?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Touchscreen Display
UltiMaker 2 lacks touchscreen display; MakerBot Method X includes one; touchscreen improves user interface.
Indicates if a touchscreen is provided for controls.
In the battle of Touchscreen Display,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touchscreen Display on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Screen Size
What is the display screen size?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
5
Inch
0Votes
vs
Screen Size
UltiMaker 2 screen size is not available; MakerBot Method X has a 5-inch screen; MakerBot offers better control interface.
Size of the display screen.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Screen Size on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Lighting Inside Chamber
Does it have chamber lighting?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
UltiMaker 2
The printer includes lighting inside the chamber. This enhances visibility of the print process and helps in monitoring print quality.
Chamber lighting to monitor prints in progress.
In the battle of Lighting Inside Chamber,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lighting Inside Chamber on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Manual Bed Leveling
Does it support manual bed leveling?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
UltiMaker 2
Manual bed leveling is required and supported by this printer. Users must perform this adjustment to ensure the print bed is perfectly flat and level.
Support for traditional manual bed leveling.
In the battle of Manual Bed Leveling,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manual Bed Leveling on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Filament Runout Sensor
Does it have a filament runout sensor?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
MakerBot Method X
Yes, a filament runout sensor is included, which automatically pauses the print job when filament runs out, preventing failed prints.
Detects when filament runs out and pauses printing.
In the battle of Filament Runout Sensor,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Filament Runout Sensor on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling Fans
Does it have cooling fans?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Cooling Fans
Both printers have cooling fans; standard for temperature control.
Fans for cooling extruder and printed layers.
In the battle of Cooling Fans,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Fans on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Motion System
What is the motion system?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Belts, Rods
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Linear Rails, Belts
MakerBot Method X
The printer utilizes a motion system composed of both Linear Rails for precision movement and Belts for driving axes.
Mechanical motion system guiding the print head.
In the battle of Motion System,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Motion System on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Frame Type
What is the frame type?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Cartesian
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Cartesian
Mechanical structure style of the printer.
In the battle of Frame Type,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frame Type on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Enclosure
Is the printer open or enclosed?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Open
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Closed
vs
Enclosure
UltiMaker 2 is open enclosure; MakerBot Method X has closed enclosure; closed enclosures improve safety and temperature control.
Whether the printer has an open or enclosed build chamber.
In the battle of Enclosure,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Enclosure on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Screen Resolution
What is the display resolution?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
128x64p
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Resolution of the display screen.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Screen Resolution on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Built-in Camera
Does it have a built-in camera?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Built-in Camera
UltiMaker 2 does not have built-in camera; MakerBot Method X includes it; useful for remote monitoring.
Camera for monitoring prints and creating time-lapses.
In the battle of Built-in Camera,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Built-in Camera on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Chamber Lighting Color Modes
What chamber lighting modes are available?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
White
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
White
Options for chamber lighting colors.
In the battle of Chamber Lighting Color Modes,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Chamber Lighting Color Modes on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Build Plate Type
What type of build plate does it have?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Glass
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Flex
vs
Build Plate Type
UltiMaker 2 uses glass build plate; MakerBot Method X uses flex build plate; flex plates aid in easier part removal.
Type of build surface material.
In the battle of Build Plate Type,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Plate Type on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Build Plate Surface Texture
What is the build plate texture?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Glass
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Textured
vs
Build Plate Surface Texture
UltiMaker 2 has glass build plate surface texture; MakerBot Method X has textured surface; textured improves adhesion for some materials.
Surface finish of the build plate.
In the battle of Build Plate Surface Texture,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Plate Surface Texture on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Bed Leveling
Does it support auto bed leveling?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Auto Bed Leveling
UltiMaker 2 lacks auto bed leveling; MakerBot Method X has it; auto leveling simplifies setup.
Automatic calibration of the print bed.
In the battle of Auto Bed Leveling,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Bed Leveling on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Power Loss Recovery
Does it support power loss recovery?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Power Loss Recovery
UltiMaker 2 does not have power loss recovery; MakerBot Method X includes it; MakerBot better protects print jobs.
Recovers print jobs after power interruptions.
In the battle of Power Loss Recovery,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Loss Recovery on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Toolhead Modularity
What modular toolheads are supported?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
None
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
None
Whether the toolhead can be swapped for other functions.
In the battle of Toolhead Modularity,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Toolhead Modularity on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Ability to use a mobile app for control/monitoring.
In the battle of Mobile App,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mobile App on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud-Based Software
Does it support cloud-based software?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
MakerBot Method X
Yes, the printer integrates with cloud-based software, enabling remote management, monitoring, and file storage.
Indicates whether the printer uses or supports cloud software.
In the battle of Cloud-Based Software,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud-Based Software on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Supported Slicers
Which slicers are supported?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Cura
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
Makerware
MakerBot Method X
The printer primarily supports Makerware as its slicing software.
Slicer programs that are compatible with the printer.
In the battle of Supported Slicers,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Supported Slicers on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Supported File Formats
What file formats are supported?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
STL, OBJ, DAE, AMF, G-code
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
STL, OBJ, 3MF, G-code
MakerBot Method X
The printer supports common 3D printing file formats such as STL, OBJ, 3MF, and G-code, ensuring broad compatibility with design software.
File types accepted for printing.
In the battle of Supported File Formats,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Supported File Formats on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Update
Does the printer support firmware updates?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
UltiMaker 2
Firmware updates are supported for this printer. Regular updates can introduce new features, improve performance, and fix bugs.
Indicates whether the printer supports firmware updates; important for new features and bug fixes.
In the battle of Firmware Update,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Update on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Monitoring
Does it support remote monitoring?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Ability to monitor prints remotely via app or web.
In the battle of Remote Monitoring,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Monitoring on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Proprietary Software Required
Is proprietary software required?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Whether use of manufacturer’s software is mandatory.
In the battle of Proprietary Software Required,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
better than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Software Required on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
File Transfer Method
What file transfer methods are supported?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
SD Card
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
USB, Wi-Fi, LAN, Cloud
Methods available to transfer files to the printer.
In the battle of File Transfer Method,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
File Transfer Method on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
API/SDK Integration
Does it support API/SDK integration?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Allows developers to integrate with APIs or SDKs.
In the battle of API/SDK Integration,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
API/SDK Integration on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Multi-Printer Fleet Control,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Printer Fleet Control on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Time-Lapse Recording
Does it support time-lapse recording?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Time-Lapse Recording
UltiMaker 2 does not have time-lapse recording; MakerBot Method X includes it; MakerBot adds visual documentation.
Ability to capture time-lapse videos of prints.
In the battle of Time-Lapse Recording,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Time-Lapse Recording on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Remote Firmware Update,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Firmware Update on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Type of UV light source used to cure resin layers.
In the battle of UV Light Source Type,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
UV Light Source Type on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Resin Heating System
Does it have a resin heating system?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
MakerBot Method X
No, this FDM/FFF printer does not have a resin heating system, as it is designed for filament-based printing.
Whether the printer can heat resin for optimal viscosity.
In the battle of Resin Heating System,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Resin Heating System on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
UV Power Output
What is the UV power output?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Strength of UV light exposure affecting curing speed and accuracy.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
UV Power Output on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Resin Layer Curing Speed
What is the resin layer curing speed?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to cure one resin layer.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Resin Layer Curing Speed on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Resin Tank Lifetime
What is the resin tank lifetime?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Approximate number of prints before resin tank replacement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Resin Tank Lifetime on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Resin Cartridge System
Does it use a resin cartridge system?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Whether it uses a sealed resin cartridge system for easy handling.
In the battle of Resin Cartridge System,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Resin Cartridge System on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Resin Mixing
Does it have auto resin mixing?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Whether resin is automatically mixed during operation for consistency.
In the battle of Auto Resin Mixing,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Resin Mixing on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Wash Time
What is the wash time?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Typical duration to wash prints in post-processing.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wash Time on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Cure Time
What is the cure time?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Typical duration to fully cure resin prints after washing.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cure Time on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Post-Processing Equipment Compatibility
Is it compatible with post-processing equipment?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Whether the printer supports integration with wash/cure stations.
In the battle of Post-Processing Equipment Compatibility,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Post-Processing Equipment Compatibility on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Dedicated button to stop the printer instantly in emergencies.
In the battle of Emergency Stop Button,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Emergency Stop Button on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Child Lock Mode
Does it have a child lock mode?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
MakerBot Method X
No, a dedicated child lock mode is not available on this device.
A setting that prevents unauthorized or unsafe use by children.
In the battle of Child Lock Mode,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Lock Mode on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certifications
What safety certifications does it have?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
CE
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
CE, FCC
vs
Safety Certifications
UltiMaker 2 safety certification is CE; MakerBot Method X is CE and FCC certified; MakerBot has broader certifications.
Official safety standards the printer complies with.
In the battle of Safety Certifications,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certifications on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Enclosure Lock
Does it have an enclosure lock?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Prevents accidental access to the chamber while printing.
In the battle of Enclosure Lock,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Enclosure Lock on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Fireproof Build Plate
Does it have a fireproof build plate?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Build plate is resistant to fire for extra safety.
In the battle of Fireproof Build Plate,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fireproof Build Plate on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it feature overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Overheat Protection
Both have overheat protection; essential safety feature.
Shuts down printer when components exceed safe temps.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shutdown on Error
Does it auto shut down on errors?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Shuts printer down automatically when critical errors occur.
In the battle of Auto Shutdown on Error,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shutdown on Error on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Resin Spill Protection
Does it have resin spill protection?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Prevents or contains resin leaks in resin printers.
In the battle of Resin Spill Protection,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Resin Spill Protection on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Air Quality Compliance
Is it compliant with air quality standards?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Meets air quality standards for emissions and filtration.
In the battle of Air Quality Compliance,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Air Quality Compliance on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
This 3D printer is designed for tool-free maintenance. This makes routine tasks and basic servicing easier and faster to perform without specialized tools.
Allows key maintenance tasks without tools.
In the battle of Tool-Free Maintenance,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tool-Free Maintenance on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Nozzle Replaceable
Is the nozzle replaceable?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Nozzle Replaceable
Both have replaceable nozzles; easy maintenance.
Specifies if the nozzle can be replaced with different sizes or when worn.
In the battle of Nozzle Replaceable,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Nozzle Replaceable on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Spare Parts Availability
Are spare parts available?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Spare Parts Availability
Both have spare parts available; maintainable printers.
Whether spare parts are readily available for purchase.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spare Parts Availability on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Upgrade Options
What upgrade options are supported?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Enclosure, Camera
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
None
vs
Upgrade Options
UltiMaker 2 offers upgrade options including enclosure and camera; MakerBot Method X has none; UltiMaker supports hardware upgrades.
Supported upgrade kits and modules for expanding functionality.
In the battle of Upgrade Options,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Upgrade Options on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Self-Diagnostics
Does it have self-diagnostics?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
MakerBot Method X
Yes, the printer includes self-diagnostic capabilities to identify and report potential hardware or software issues.
Printer can analyze itself for common faults and errors.
In the battle of Self-Diagnostics,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Self-Diagnostics on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Lubrication Required
Does it require lubrication?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Lubrication Required
Both require lubrication; routine maintenance needed.
Indicates if lubrication is needed for smooth operation.
In the battle of Lubrication Required,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lubrication Required on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Supported Mod Kits
What mod kits are supported?
0
UltiMaker 2
0Votes
Enclosure
0
MakerBot Method X
0Votes
None
Officially supported modification kits.
In the battle of Supported Mod Kits,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Supported Mod Kits on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Reminders
Does it provide maintenance reminders?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Maintenance Reminders
UltiMaker 2 lacks maintenance reminders; MakerBot Method X provides them; reminders help upkeep.
Automated alerts to schedule maintenance tasks.
In the battle of Maintenance Reminders,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maintenance Reminders on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Predictive Maintenance Alerts
Does it feature predictive maintenance alerts?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Predicts potential failures and alerts the user before issues arise.
In the battle of Predictive Maintenance Alerts,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Predictive Maintenance Alerts on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Service Interval
What is the service interval?
Who knows?
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Recommended time between major servicing.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Service Interval on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Ability to manage multiple devices remotely via cloud software.
In the battle of Cloud Fleet Management,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Fleet Management on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Workflow Integration
Does it integrate with workflows?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Workflow Integration
UltiMaker 2 does not offer workflow integration; MakerBot Method X does; MakerBot integrates better into professional workflows.
Integration with professional workflow tools and design platforms.
In the battle of Workflow Integration,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Workflow Integration on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-User Profiles
Does it support multi-user profiles?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Allows multiple users to have distinct profiles and permissions.
In the battle of Multi-User Profiles,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-User Profiles on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Access Control
Does it support remote access control?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Ability to control printer access remotely with permissions.
In the battle of Remote Access Control,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Access Control on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Enterprise Security Features
Does it have enterprise security features?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Enterprise Security Features
UltiMaker 2 does not have enterprise security features; MakerBot Method X includes them; MakerBot is better suited for enterprises.
Advanced security measures like encryption, secure login, and permissions.
In the battle of Enterprise Security Features,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Enterprise Security Features on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Usage Analytics Dashboard
Does it include a usage analytics dashboard?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Usage Analytics Dashboard
UltiMaker 2 lacks usage analytics dashboard; MakerBot Method X includes it; analytics aid in monitoring printer usage.
Provides usage statistics and analytics for tracking productivity and costs.
In the battle of Usage Analytics Dashboard,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Usage Analytics Dashboard on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
SLA & Support Contracts
Are SLA or support contracts available?
Yes
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Option for service-level agreements and premium support contracts.
In the battle of SLA & Support Contracts,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
SLA & Support Contracts on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Predictive Cost Estimation
Does it have predictive cost estimation?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Predictive Cost Estimation
UltiMaker 2 does not support predictive cost estimation; MakerBot Method X does; MakerBot helps estimate print costs.
Estimates printing costs (material, power, time) before job start.
In the battle of Predictive Cost Estimation,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Predictive Cost Estimation on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
The printer features bed temperature sensors. These sensors help monitor and regulate the heated bed, ensuring consistent and optimal adhesion for prints.
MakerBot Method X
Yes, the build plate is equipped with temperature sensors to ensure accurate and consistent heating across the print surface.
Detects and regulates the build plate temperature.
In the battle of Bed Temperature Sensors,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bed Temperature Sensors on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Sensor Count
UltiMaker 2 has 3 total sensors; MakerBot Method X's count unavailable; UltiMaker explicitly states sensor quantity.
total number of sensors installed in the printer.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensor Count on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Vibration Sensor
Does it include a vibration sensor?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
MakerBot Method X
Yes, a vibration sensor is integrated to detect and potentially compensate for vibrations, which can impact print quality.
Detects vibrations and compensates for print accuracy.
In the battle of Vibration Sensor,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Vibration Sensor on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Error Alerts
Does it provide remote error alerts?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Remote Error Alerts
UltiMaker 2 does not send remote error alerts; MakerBot Method X does; MakerBot improves remote fault awareness.
Sends error notifications to remote devices.
In the battle of Remote Error Alerts,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Error Alerts on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Extruder Pressure Sensor
Does it have an extruder pressure sensor?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
No
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Extruder Pressure Sensor
Both lack extruder pressure sensors.
Monitors extrusion pressure to prevent under- or over-extrusion.
In the battle of Extruder Pressure Sensor,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
same as
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Extruder Pressure Sensor on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Print Log Storage
Does it have print log storage?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Records print job history and diagnostic data.
In the battle of Print Log Storage,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Print Log Storage on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Predictive Failure Logs
Does it support predictive failure logs?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
vs
Predictive Failure Logs
UltiMaker 2 lacks predictive failure logs; MakerBot Method X supports them; predictive logs help in maintenance planning.
Tracks and predicts potential failures before they occur.
In the battle of Predictive Failure Logs,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Predictive Failure Logs on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Calibration History Log
Does it have a calibration history log?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Stores history of calibration for quality control.
In the battle of Calibration History Log,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Calibration History Log on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Chamber Temperature Sensors
Does it have chamber temperature sensors?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Tracks and maintains chamber temperature for consistent prints.
In the battle of Chamber Temperature Sensors,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Chamber Temperature Sensors on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Filament Jam Detection
Does it support filament jam detection?
No
0Votes
UltiMaker 2
Yes
0Votes
MakerBot Method X
Detects blockages or jams in the filament path.
In the battle of Filament Jam Detection,
UltiMaker 2 ◉ is
worse than
MakerBot Method X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Filament Jam Detection on UltiMaker 2 ◉
vs MakerBot Method X ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Printing Speed
How would you rate the printing speed of this 3D printer?
Lightning fast — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Fast — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate speed — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Print Quality and Detail
How would you describe the print quality and level of detail produced by this 3D printer?
Ultra fine detail — Layer height below 0.05 mm
0Votes
0Votes
Fine detail — Layer height 0.05 to 0.1 mm
0Votes
0Votes
Good detail — Layer height 0.1 to 0.2 mm
0Votes
0Votes
Decent detail — Layer height 0.2 to 0.3 mm
0Votes
0Votes
Rough and basic — Layer height above 0.3 mm
0Votes
0Votes
Build Volume Capacity
How do you find the build volume capacity of this 3D printer?
Extra large projects — Over 400 mm each side
0Votes
0Votes
Large projects — 300 to 400 mm each side
0Votes
0Votes
Medium projects — 200 to 300 mm each side
0Votes
0Votes
Small projects — 150 to 200 mm each side
0Votes
0Votes
Tiny prints only — Under 150 x 150 x 150 mm
0Votes
0Votes
Material Consumption Efficiency
How efficient is this 3D printer in using filament or resin materials?
Very efficient — Under 50 grams per model
0Votes
0Votes
Efficient — 50 to 70 grams per model
0Votes
0Votes
Decent efficiency — 70 to 100 grams per model
0Votes
0Votes
Average efficiency — 100 to 150 grams per model
0Votes
0Votes
Wasteful — Over 150 grams per model
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Level
How noisy is this 3D printer during operation?
Whisper quiet
0Votes
0Votes
Quiet most of the time
0Votes
0Votes
Manageable with background noise
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeable but tolerable
0Votes
0Votes
Loud and distracting
0Votes
0Votes
Durability and Lifespan
How durable does this 3D printer seem in terms of lifespan?
Very durable — Over 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 3 to 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Decent lifespan — 2 to 3 years
0Votes
0Votes
Short lifespan — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Breaks down quickly — Under 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Performance
How would you rate the overall performance of this 3D printer in terms of print quality and reliability?
Excellent — Consistently produces high-quality prints with no issues
0Votes
0Votes
Good — Produces quality prints with minor inconsistencies
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Prints are acceptable with occasional issues
0Votes
0Votes
Below average — Frequent print failures or inconsistencies
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Often fails to produce quality prints
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Setup
How easy was the setup process for this 3D printer?
Very easy — The printer was simple to set up with clear instructions and minimal effort
0Votes
0Votes
Easy — Setup was straightforward, with only a few minor adjustments needed
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Setup was manageable but took time and required some troubleshooting
0Votes
0Votes
Challenging — Setup was difficult and required assistance from support or additional resources
0Votes
0Votes
Very difficult — Setup was complicated, with unclear instructions and many issues during the process
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How would you rate the pricing for this 3D printer?
Great value for money — Offers excellent features and performance at an affordable price
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price — Decent pricing for the features, a reasonable value
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal — The price is acceptable but might be slightly high for the features offered
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey — The price feels a bit high compared to similar models
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive — The price is significantly higher than other options with similar features
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How would you rate the design appeal of this 3D printer?
Excellent — Sleek, modern design that looks great in any workspace
0Votes
0Votes
Good — Attractive and functional design that fits well in most environments
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Standard design with no particular standout features
0Votes
0Votes
Fair — Design feels bulky or outdated, but still serves its purpose
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Unattractive design, clunky and may be an eyesore in most spaces
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
